fix: Implement recursive expansion for axioms A5 and A6#54
Merged
netkeep80 merged 3 commits intonetkeep80:mainfrom Feb 13, 2026
Merged
fix: Implement recursive expansion for axioms A5 and A6#54netkeep80 merged 3 commits intonetkeep80:mainfrom
netkeep80 merged 3 commits intonetkeep80:mainfrom
Conversation
Adding CLAUDE.md with task information for AI processing. This file will be removed when the task is complete. Issue: netkeep80#53
This commit implements recursive expansion for Male (♂x) and Female (x♀) expressions, similar to the recursive collapse implemented for Infinity (∞) in issue netkeep80#51. Changes: - Added expandMale() function to recursively expand Male expressions using axiom A5: ♂x = (♂x -> x) - Added expandFemale() function to recursively expand Female expressions using axiom A6: x♀ = (x -> x♀) - Integrated these functions into checkEquality() to verify recursive expansions like: - ♂v = ♂v -> v -> v -> v (left-associative) - r♀ = r -> (r -> (r -> r♀)) (right-associative) - Added comprehensive test cases for both Male and Female recursive expansions The implementation follows the same pattern as collapseInfinity(): 1. ♂v = (♂v -> v) by A5 2. Substituting ♂v: ♂v = ((♂v -> v) -> v) 3. Therefore: ♂v = (((♂v -> v) -> v) -> v) 4. And so on recursively... Fixes netkeep80#53 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This reverts commit 07a2c5e.
Contributor
Author
🤖 Solution Draft LogThis log file contains the complete execution trace of the AI solution draft process. 💰 Cost estimation:
Now working session is ended, feel free to review and add any feedback on the solution draft. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🎯 Summary
This PR implements recursive expansion for Male (♂x) and Female (x♀) expressions, fixing the issue where
♂v = ♂v -> v -> v -> vwas incorrectly marked as unprovable.📋 Issue Reference
Fixes #53
🔍 Problem
The formula
♂v = ♂v -> v -> v -> vwas being marked as failed (✗), but it should be provable through recursive expansion of axiom A5, similar to how axiom A4 handles recursive collapsing for infinity expressions.According to axiom A5:
♂x = ♂x -> xThe recursive expansion works as follows:
♂v = (♂v -> v)by A5♂v:♂v = ((♂v -> v) -> v)♂v = (((♂v -> v) -> v) -> v)🛠️ Solution
Implementation Details
Added
expandMale()function - Recursively expands Male expressions using axiom A5:♂x = (♂x -> x)(♂x -> x),((♂x -> x) -> x), etc. back to♂xcollapseInfinity()works for A4Added
expandFemale()function - Recursively expands Female expressions using axiom A6:x♀ = (x -> x♀)(x -> x♀),(x -> (x -> x♀)), etc. back tox♀Integrated into
checkEquality()- Added recursive expansion checks after simple axiom applications and before infinity collapseTest Coverage
Added comprehensive test suites for both axioms:
Male expansion (A5):
♂v = ♂v -> v -> v -> v(left-associative, 3-level)♂v = (♂v -> v) -> v(2-level)♂v = ((♂v -> v) -> v) -> v(3-level explicit)Female expansion (A6):
r♀ = r -> (r -> r♀)(right-associative, 2-level)r♀ = r -> (r -> (r -> r♀))(3-level)✅ Testing
📊 Test Results
🎨 Example Output
Before this fix, the formula would fail:
After this fix:
🔗 Related Work
This implementation follows the same pattern as the recursive collapse for infinity (issue #51), ensuring consistency across axiom handling.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 noreply@anthropic.com